CS Knowledge Base

Passport bros is a neologism coined to describe Western men who travel abroad^[1] for the purpose of dating or marrying women from a foreign country.^[2] The term became popularized through TikTok,^[3] where passport bros create content depicting their lifestyles.^[4] Passport bros have both been described as sex tourists^[5][2] or men looking for marriage abroad.^[6][7]

Passport bros are single men with high-earning employment who travel to foreign countries; they advocate for men to travel to non-western countries to increase the likelihood of them finding women that fit their Tradwife ideals.^[8] On social media, passport bros have been described as American men who travel internationally in search of traditional values-oriented women that they can have romantic relationships with via dating or marriage.^[9]

Men deemed passport bros may describe themselves as digital nomads that travel to other countries to enjoy increased purchasing power and have reduced living expenses that make it more affordable to raise a family on a single income.^[4] Many of these men believe that foreign women are more likely to have traditional values,^[10] perceive the men as rich,^[4] and enjoy showing them their local city.^[1]

Passport Bros have been described as a Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW) sub-group within the broader manosphere,^[11] and as a sub-group of Save Your Self Black Men (SYSBM).^[12] Save Your Self Black Men is a part of the Black Manosphere, which identifies African American women as a problem, advocates for African American men to seek romantic relationships with women that are not African American women, and criticizes African American women.^[12] Similar to Save Your Self Black Men, Passport Bros also criticize African American women; additionally, Passport Bros advocate for other African American men to get and use their United States passport card for international travel outside of the United States of America as a solution.^[12]

The passport bros movement has been described as a phenomenon that "illustrates how the manosphere transcends its Western origins, functioning as a multicultural and transnational domain where culture, national identities and gender are actively negotiated.”^[13] The passport bros movement is an operationalization of the Black Manosphere's racialized red pill philosophy.^[11] Passport bro social media communities (e.g., Reddit) are composed of existing passport bros, or veteran members, and aspiring passport bros, or new members.^[11] Rather than considering themselves to be an aspect of the manosphere, passport bros consider themselves to be more of a movement.^[11] In contrast to other aspects of the manosphere, passport bros are more inclined to specify and identify their race, ethnicity, and/or nationality.^[11] Additionally, contrary to social media manosphere communities that are largely composed of white men, the passport bros movement includes men of color.^[11] Passport bro communities are primarily composed of African American men as well as others, such as men of Chinese, Latino, and Indian descent.^[11] The Black Manosphere’s racialized red pill philosophy has resulted in a leveling effect upon racial and ethnic identities; consequently, this has contributed to the development of racially and ethnically inclusive spaces within the passport bros movement.^[11] While Western men have had a long history of sexual tourism in less expensive countries and countries within the Global South, passport bros have sought a combination of both sexual pleasure and long-term romantic relationships with their companions.^[13]

In 2011, Al Greeze, an African American film director, created the documentary film, Frustrated.^[2] In his documentary, Greeze used the term, “Passport Bro.”^[2] Greeze’s documentary “depicts African-American men seeking relationships with women in Brazil. According to witnesses interviewed, these men experienced a sense of displacement in the face of African-American women in the United States who were emancipated, sometimes earning more money than them, and therefore supposedly less respectful of their claimed status as dominant males. This led to the publication of short YouTube videos offering advice and strategies for relationships with foreign women.”^[2]

Charles Tyler, who was an African-American man born in Philadelphia, United States of America and produced his earliest content, “Black Brazilian Women for Afro American who Travel”, in 2012, is regarded by Ph.D. candidate Sedrick Miles as the archetype for and godfather of the Passport Bros movement.^[14] Throughout the 2010s, Charles Tyler produced YouTube content for the Charles Tyler Show (The Black Man's Option), which included content advocating for Black American men getting their United States passport card in order to travel to Brazil, content comparing African-American women with Afro-Brazilian women, content comparing African-American women with foreign women, and content discussing how to earn an income on the web.^[14] Prior to more recent social media influencers on Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube, during the times of his earliest videos in the 2010s, travel content was largely limited to blogs.^[14] Given that the travel space was predominantly occupied by white people, Tyler built his audience, independent of this established space, highlighting his experiences and knowledge about how to obtain passports and travel visas, and sharing perspectives that appealed to working-class Black American men.^[14]

A notable figure, who had significant influence within the Black Manosphere and introduced Black men to the Black Manosphere, was Kevin Samuels.^[15][12] Samuels was one of the few within the Black Manosphere who received broader mainstream recognition for his social media platform and influence.^[12] Sharp (2024) characterized Samuels as being a charismatic figure who promoted hegemonic Black masculinity and embodied the racialized red pill philosophy commonly espoused within the Black Manosphere.^[11] The message brought by Kevin Samuels laid the ideological groundwork for, among other sub-groups within the Black Manosphere, the offshoot sub-group and subculture that became the Passport Bros movement.^[15] Samuels' common talking points often serve as a major premise for advocacy within Passport Bros' messaging.^[15]

In 2020, Tommy J. Curry, who specializes in Africana philosophy and Black male studies, authored "Exposing the ‘Passport Bros’: A study on the intersection of race, masculinity, and sexuality in the African American community", where he characterized passport bros as a social media trend found among some African American men who advocate for other African American men to travel abroad for relationships and to find women in other countries that are perceived as being more submissive and having greater desirability than African American women.^[16]

In 2023, Business Insider interviewed a popular TikTok creator, Austin Abeyta, who identified with the passport bro label. He described foreign women as more open-minded and the experience of dating them as more exciting. Abeyta also believed that cultural perceptions surrounding passport bros are inaccurate since many men living abroad have successful careers and could find a partner from the US if they wanted one.^[4]

On July 19, 2023, American rapper Bas released his second single, Passport Bros, with American rapper J. Cole, which was part of Bas’ fourth studio album, We Only Talk About Real Shit When We're Fucked Up.^[17]

In 2024, Refinery29 published a piece about passport bros in Latin American countries, interviewing women about their experiences, who said passport bros believe in ethnic stereotypes, objectify women, and sexually harass them.^[18]

The passport bros movement is a sub-unit within the manosphere, where the subject of culture and nationality intersect.^[13] Passport bros are Western men who advocate for international travel to countries within the Global South and the benefits of working remotely.^[13] Comparing women in the West to women of the Global South, passport bros advocate for travel to countries in the Global South for the purpose of finding women who are characterized and viewed as being more submissive and feminine.^[13] A common narrative among passport bros are men who became digital nomads after having quit their previous jobs, and lower cost of living abroad.^[13] Contrary to the characterization of the manosphere as being composed of young men who are not well educated, have not been successful, and are marginalized, analysis of sub-reddit data demonstrates that passport bros are men of various ages who have specialized forms of employment or considerable amounts of money in their savings accounts; consequently, this provides them the ability to work or live internationally for months at a time.^[13] The common problems identified in the manosphere with dating women in the West has been met with the solution found in the passport bros movement via international dating with women in the Global South.^[13]

Within the Reddit social media communities of passport bros, inquiries include consideration of whether it is the best decision to return to Europe or the United States of America with their Asian wives in hope of preventing her from becoming westernized and what countries are best to consider if one is a speaker of the Russian language.^[13] The four themes found among the sub-reddit passport bros were: Nation and Relationship Goals, where passport bros establish ties between their goals for relationships, the countries, and stereotypes about the countries; Class Discussions and Economic Leverage, where passport bros consider financial differences and societal structures within societies; Cultural Parallels, where passport bros make comparisons between countries to justify the opinions they have; and Self-reflection, where passport bros consider their social position in prediction of how they may be viewed in other countries.^[13] In one of the passport bro discussions regarding whether or not a Black men should immigrate to China, a user stated: “dark skin is seen as a feature of the peasant class. China is the last place I'd advise a brother to come to as there's a lot working against us.”^[13]

A view shared by a passport bro regarding the characterization of Passport Bros:^[19]

Passport Bros are driven by a desire for peace, appreciation, respect, kindness, and love within relationships, values they feel are increasingly rare in their own cultural context. They see the trend of shifting demographics and cultural changes within Western societies as a cause for concern, believing that the traditional foundations of relationships are under threat. As a response (…) [we] choose to explore relationships with foreign women who are (…) more in line with their desired values and expectations.^[19]

Passport bros may invoke angry Black woman or strong Black woman stereotypes as a teaching tool for informing Black men about Black masculinity.^[15] Drummond (2023) indicates that Latinas and Black American women have their agency taken away from them through Passport Bros’ advocacy of sexual tourism for women of the Global South and traditional gender roles.^[15] She also views the song, Beautiful, as an apt audiovisual analogy for passport bros’ advocacy to specifically visit Brazil, which is characterized as a fantasy depiction of scantily clad, exoticized Brazilian women who were physically lustful toward Black American men.^[15] The non-conformity to female gender roles within patriarchy and non-submissive behavior of Black American women has been characterized as one of the major assertions made by passport bros about Black American women.^[15] A major premise held within passport bro advocacy that she identifies is the perception that in order to find love a necessary precondition is to choose women in Latin America over Black American women; this choice in mate selection is due to the view held that Latin American women are women who still subscribe to traditional gender roles and values, which is also characterized as being “motivated by a fantasy experience where they exercise their power regarding gender, race, class, and nationality.”^[15] Drummond (2023) indicates that the following view expressed is emblematic of the views commonly shared by the broader passport bro community:^[15]

The reality is that many of these men who are choosing to travel abroad are high value six figure men that many of you modern women claim you want with the caveat being that many of these men who choose to exercise their options and travel abroad are traditional men who are in search of traditional women and who want nothing to do with modern women and their feminist ideologies and mindsets. Instead, these men are choosing to go to other countries to meet women who understand what it means to be a wife and help me. Women who understand what it means to reflect and respect his values and his standards. Women who are feminine and submissive and not combative, are traditional men in search of traditional women.^[15]

A common symbolic gesture made by passport bros is showing their United States passport card in their advocacy of the passport bros movement, which is characterized as being done as an act of leveraging one’s self-perceived American privilege and done based on the presumption of being viewed as financially wealthy when traveling within Latin America.^[15] The stigma commonly applied to the term “modern” in the description of Black American women as “modern women” is characterized by Drummond (2023) as also implying that women in Latin America are viewed as non-modern colonial subjects who have not been influenced by feminism, and that, contrary to that, feminism does exist in Brazil.^[15] Generally, Afro-Latinas and Afro-Brazilian women have been sexually objectified and used in the material promotions and advertisements in Brazil for sex tourism and girlfriend experiences.^[15] Consequently, this has fed into the preconceived notions held by passport bros regarding the sexual availability of Afro-Latinas in general and Afro-Brazilian women in particular.^[15] Drummond (2023) recognized that passport bros frequently dispute the allegations of their advocacy as being promotions of sex tourism, but she contends that the advocacy still falls into the pre-travel messaging for sex tourism.^[15] Drummond (2023) contends that the Black American women stereotypes invoked by passport bros to contrast Black American women with women in Latin America drives further competition between Latin American and Black American women and creates a picture of the soft life granted to womanhood by patriarchy as being set aside for women in Latin America and Black American women as being undeserving of the same class of womanhood.^[15]

The development of social media has facilitated and enhanced the ability of individuals and communities being producers of culture and social messaging that have considerable influence on the development of gender identifies and performance of gender roles.^[20] Passport bros is example of this.^[20] Passport bros advocate for rejecting western women who are characterized as independent and seeking out traditional foreign women instead.^[20]

The equalization of heteronormative reality between men and women within heterosexual relationships has resulted in some men rejecting the changes occurring domestically and seeking alternatives on the web and internationally to broaden their search.^[21] Cross-cultural relationships and the international dating industry in foreign countries serve as an outlet for the passport bros movement akin to international frontiersmen and explorers seeking out a glorious unknown.^[21]

Sharp (2024) critiqued the pattern of white heteropatriarchy often found in literature on the manosphere, which focuses on topics such as aggrieved entitlement and heteropatriarchy and centers white men for critique of white privilege and male privilege, and is frequently absent on the intersectional topics of race and gender; he indicates that advancement in insights of both intersectionality and masculinity can be gained by centering black men for critique and that centering black men for critique introduces complexities to the overly simplistic ideas and presumptions about gender and privilege that critical literature on the manosphere frequently has.^[11] Whiteness, as a presumed default, techno-cultural identifier, has resulted in its conflation with digital identity.^[11] The passport bros movement is a growing digital community of men who emphasize the power of men’s choice and the choosability of women.^[11] Passport bros reject relationships with western women, who are viewed as having and demonstrating entitled social and financial behaviors in relationships, in favor of relationships with women from non-western countries that include performance of traditional gender roles and that reaffirm their sense of traditional masculinity, which Sharp (2024) characterizes as bearing features of cultural imperialism and neocolonialism.^[11] More specifically, Sharp (2024) states: “In a neocolonial act of exploitation, passportbros suggest that foreign women are more accessible with American currency and status, perpetuating colonial legacies and imperialism through online forums.”^[11] Additionally, Sharp (2024) indicates the anti-western women rhetoric shared by passport bros propagates stereotypes and perceptions that are harmful to western women.^[11] Within the broader manosphere, the term “modern women” is a neologism and archetype that carries a “post-feminist sentiment of female agency and financial independence from men.”^[11]

In contrast to MGTOW, and in parallel with pick-up artists in the manosphere, passport bros both actively separate themselves from western women and actively initiate sexual relationships with non-western women.^[11] Akin to incel segments of the manosphere, looks are also another aspect of conversation within passport bro communities, where men who may be locally regarded as physically unattractive are advised that they may fare better in finding and forming relationships with attractive women in foreign countries.^[11] In particular, some within the passport bros digital communities have proposed a “’just-be-white’ theory, which posits that adherence to Eurocentric standards is crucial for successful dating.”^[11] Regarding discussions about western women, for passport bros, western women are “often depicted as entitled, with a laundry list of contradictory expectations—such as desiring a traditional man while not embodying traditional values themselves—being overweight and failing to appreciate Western men's efforts.”^[11] Additionally, western women are also “described as self-absorbed and overly righteous in their rejection of traditional gender roles, thus rendering traditional relationships obsolete. Bitterness permeates the posts in this forum, with many discussing Western women's envy of passportbros' economic and romantic mobility.”^[11] The rationale behind such discussions is that since western women are “financially independent and liberated, they generally do not feel the need for men. Consequently, they only date men they can emotionally dominate and view as entertainment, positioning all their prospective matches under their control.”^[11] In similarity with MGTOW, passport bros seek to separate themselves from western women and the West at large.^[11] As part of the advocated solution to the perceived problem, passport bros advocate for travel to foreign countries, where, in contrast to western women, non-western women are characterized as being more submissive, traditional, appreciative, and family-oriented as well as having more humility and reasonability.^[11] Despite there being contrasting views on gender roles and non-western women within the passport bro community, the common and shared unifier within the passport bro community is the critical view of western women.^[11]

Sanders (2024) states: “Both SYSBM and passport bros share the belief that their basis for denouncing Black women is because Black women are non-traditional women in the sense that they lack femininity, they are not submissive in their actions towards their romantic partners, and they are not in good physical shape. These collective groups within the Black Manosphere are united through their rhetoric that is embedded in misogynoir to specifically target Black women. Their misogynoir-based rhetoric is used for systematic messaging to center Black women, specifically Black American women, as the single cause of the negative outcomes that Black men face and the disadvantages of Black people.”^[12] Sanders (2024) later clarified: “The theme contempt for Black women exhibited the attitudes and beliefs of the Black Manosphere towards Black women. The contempt for Black women was evident in several forms, including deliberate disrespect and derogatory remarks. Numerous tweets from the Black Manosphere conveyed a strong sense of disdain, scorn, and disrespect towards Black women, reflecting the belief that they are insignificant and undeserving of respect.”^[12] Based on this characterized premise and rationale, SYSBM and Passport Bros both advocate for African American mens’ separation from African American women, and Passport Bros specifically advocate for African American men to use their passports to seek what they believe to be better prospects of women, internationally.^[12]

Collins (2025) highlighted the stereotyping, prejudice, colorism, misogynoir, and anti-Blackness found within the advocacy of passport bros, such as fetishizing women of color in non-western countries and emphasis on the decreased desirability of Black American women for relationships.^[16]

Panasiuk (2025) recognized the similarities in messaging between Playboy Magazine and the manosphere: “sex without marriage, children as burden.”^[22] Additionally, the shared similarity between the advocacy of women’s independence from men by feminists and the advocacy of men not committing to women by passport bros and MGTOW were viewed as being contributing factors that stop families from being formed.^[22] Framed within her broader argument, Panasiuk (2025) indicates that feminist, MGTOW, and passport bro advocacy, which contributes to stopping the forming of families, serves a larger purpose within neoliberal capitalism through not resisting its gender management strategy, and concludes: “cultural production is not neutral entertainment but targeted psychological warfare, executed through discrete, aesthetically seductive fragments that cumulatively reshape subjectivity.”^[22]

Passport bros disapprove of what they perceive as the entitled behavior and promiscuity of western women; consequently, passport bros travel internationally in search of a wives in non-western countries.^[23] Soh (2026) posits the possibility of passport bro advocacy for traveling abroad as an intrasexual competition strategy to advocate for men to travel internationally, which, as a result, gives the men who remain increased domestic advantage with the women in western countries due to the decrease in number of men to compete with over the women.^[23]

Passport bros advocate for traveling to countries in Asia and other countries within the Global South.^[20] Countries and regions that passport bros have advocated travel to include: Africa,^[11] Brazil,^[11] Colombia,^[20][11][13] Dominican Republic,^[8] Eastern Europe,^[11][13] Japan,^[8] Latin America,^[11] Philippines,^{[20][11][13][8]} Russia^[11][13] and Thailand.^[11][8] Passport bros commonly stigmatize and warn against traveling to western countries, such as Canada, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America.^[8]

The movement has attracted criticism on social media and in the press. By November 2023 the #passportbros hashtag had accumulated more than 470 million views on TikTok, and critics argued that the trend rested on unequal power dynamics between visiting men and local women and that it objectified the women involved.^[25] A 2024 Refinery29 report on the harassment of women by tourists in Latin America noted the movement's growing popularity in the region and quoted women who said that visiting men approached them through stereotypes about Latinas, with some describing unwelcome comments and physical contact.^[18] The report described such harassment as a widely normalized but rarely discussed aspect of tourism in the region and noted that local women had begun publicizing their experiences, among them Andrea Guzmán, a Mexico City yoga instructor whose 2023 TikTok video criticized the sexist stereotypes that passport bros applied to women in the city.^[18] Creators on TikTok also disputed the movement's premise that women outside the West are more "traditional" and therefore less demanding; in one widely shared clip, the Moroccan matchmaker Nina Kharoufeh explained to an American client that Arab women typically expect the man to act as provider.^[26]

Commentators have described the trend as a reversal of the mail-order bride industry, whereby the 'passport bro' travels abroad rather than the prospective bride relocating to his country.^[27][28] Writing in The Conversation in 2025, a researcher who had interviewed American users of international dating services between 2010 and 2022, with fieldwork in Ukraine, Colombia and the Philippines, placed passport bros within the longer history of an industry that markets traditional gender roles, arguing that many of the men involved were responding to women's growing financial independence and seeking relationships that reaffirmed their role as providers.^[29] A 2025 analysis in the Sri Lankan newspaper The Sun linked the movement to the online manosphere, arguing that recommendation algorithms steer men from travel content toward material that disparages Western women and idealizes submissiveness among Asian women. The same piece reported concerns from women's advocacy groups in the region about older foreign men grooming much younger local women, and stated that some Southeast Asian governments had tightened visa rules and acted against marriage brokerage agencies in response.^[30] In 2026 The Economist reported on the trend from Da Nang, Vietnam, describing online content in which passport bros rank countries by how "feminine" or "traditional" their women are, with Thailand, Brazil, Colombia, the Philippines and Vietnam among the most popular destinations, and observed that the movement's messaging can echo hostile manosphere rhetoric.^[31][32]

Commentators responding to the trend have also rejected portrayals of women in the countries concerned as uniformly submissive or dependent.^[18][26] The Philippines, one of the destinations most associated with the movement, was the highest ranked Asian country on the World Economic Forum's 2025 Global Gender Gap Index, placing 20th of 148 countries overall and 13th for economic participation and opportunity, and has elected two female presidents, Corazon Aquino and Gloria Macapagal Arroyo.^[33][34] South Korea is the origin of the 4B movement, a feminist campaign in which women reject dating, marriage, childbirth and sex with men, and which drew a surge of interest from American women after the 2024 United States presidential election; the country elected Park Geun-hye as its first female president in 2012.^[35] In October 2025 the Japanese parliament elected Sanae Takaichi as the country's first female prime minister.^[36] Mexico, whose capital has been described as an epicenter of the trend,^[18] elected Claudia Sheinbaum as its first female president in 2024. In Europe, Estonia has had a female head of state and a female head of government, with Kersti Kaljulaid serving as president from 2016 to 2021 and Kaja Kallas as prime minister from 2021 to 2024 before her appointment as the European Union's top diplomat, while Poland has had three female prime ministers, most recently Beata Szydło, and saw mass protests led by women and organized by the All-Poland Women's Strike in 2020. Several European countries associated with the trend, including Poland, Romania and Estonia, are members of the European Union and NATO and are conventionally classified as part of the Western world.^[25]

The passports held by the movement's mostly American and British participants have also declined in international mobility rankings. On the January 2026 edition of the Henley Passport Index, which ranks passports by the number of destinations their holders can enter without a prior visa, the United States stood tenth with access to 179 destinations, having fallen out of the top ten in 2025 for the first time in the index's history, while the United Kingdom stood seventh with 182 destinations after losing eight of them over the preceding twelve months, the steepest decline on the index in that period.^[37][38] By comparison, Japan and South Korea were joint second with access to 188 destinations, and Poland and Estonia were among the countries sharing sixth place with 183.^[37][38] Henley & Partners reported that over the two decades of the index the United States had recorded the third largest ranking decline of any country, falling from fourth to tenth place, with the United Kingdom the fourth largest, falling from third to seventh.^[39] As of June 2026, the rival Passport Index published by Arton Capital, which also counts electronic visas and travel authorizations, ranked the Japanese, South Korean and Polish passports (mobility score 173) and the Estonian and Romanian passports (172) above those of the United Kingdom (171) and the United States (169, level with Iceland).^[40] Henley's separate Openness Index, which measures how many nationalities a country admits without a prior visa, placed the United States 78th, admitting 46 nationalities, one of the widest gaps recorded between the travel freedom a country's citizens enjoy abroad and the access it grants to visitors.^[39][38]

On July 19, 2023, American rapper Bas released his second single, Passport Bros, with American rapper J. Cole, which was part of Bas’ fourth studio album, We Only Talk About Real Shit When We're Fucked Up.^[17]

• Black Manosphere
• Expatriate
• Mail-order bride
• Neocolonialism
• Perpetual traveller – Concept of basing aspects of one's life in different countriesPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
• White savior