This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 534 of the United States Reports:

Case name Citation Date decided
Postal Serv. v. Gregory 534 U.S. 1 November 13, 2001
TRW Inc. v. Andrews 534 U.S. 19 2001
Nebraska v. Wyoming 534 U.S. 40 2001
Correctional Serv. Corp. v. Malesko 534 U.S. 61 2001
Chickasaw Nation v. United States 534 U.S. 84 2001
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta 534 U.S. 103 2001
United States v. Knights (2001) 534 U.S. 112 2001
J.E.M. Ag Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int'l, Inc. 534 U.S. 124 2001
Stewart v. Smith 534 U.S. 157 2001
Granted certiorari and certified a question to the Supreme Court of Arizona; see later opinion at 536 U.S. 856 (2002).
Dusenbery v. United States 534 U.S. 161 January 8, 2002
To afford due-process notice, the government must attempt to provide actual notice, but it is not required to have succeeded in giving actual notice. Further, a better method for providing notice that was not known at the time the notice was given will not render reasonable notice unreasonable.
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams 534 U.S. 184 2002
Great-West Life & Annuity Ins. Co. v. Knudson 534 U.S. 204 2002
Chao v. Mallard Bay Drilling, Inc. 534 U.S. 235 2002
Kelly v. South Carolina 534 U.S. 246 2002
United States v. Arvizu 534 U.S. 266 2002
EEOC v. Waffle House, Inc. 534 U.S. 279 2002
An agreement between an employer and an employee to arbitrate employment-related disputes does not bar the EEOC from pursuing victim-specific judicial relief, such as backpay, reinstatement, and damages, in an ADA enforcement action.
Thomas v. Chi. Park Dist. 534 U.S. 316 2002
Nat'l Cable & Telecommunications Ass'n, Inc. v. Gulf Power Co. 534 U.S. 327 2002
Lee v. Kemna 534 U.S. 362 2002
Kansas v. Crane 534 U.S. 407 2002
Owasso Independent Sch. Dist. v. Falvo 534 U.S. 426 2002
Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co. 534 U.S. 438 2002
The Coal Act does not permit the Commissioner to assign retired miners to the successors in interest of out-of-business signatory operators.
Wis. Dept. of Health and Family Servs. v. Blumer 534 U.S. 473 2002
Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. 534 U.S. 506 2002
Porter v. Nussle 534 U.S. 516 2002
Raygor v. Univ. of Minn. 534 U.S. 533 2002
ADEA Section 1367(d) does not toll the limitations period for state law claims asserted against non consenting state defendants that are dismissed on Eleventh Amendment grounds.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_534