RFC Errata
RFC 5952, "A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation", August 2010
Source of RFC: 6man (int)
Errata ID: 4985
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Julian de Prado
Date Reported: 2017-03-31
Rejected by: Erik Kline
Date Rejected: 2025-09-04
Section 2.2 says:
In cases where there is more than one field of only zeros, there is a choice of how many fields can be shortened. 2001:db8:0:0:0::1 2001:db8:0:0::1 2001:db8:0::1 2001:db8::1
It should say:
In cases where there is more than one field of only zeros,there is a choice of how many fields can be shortened, but must be shortened to its maximum capability. 2001:db8:0:0:0::1 is NOT acceptable 2001:db8:0:0::1 is NOT acceptable 2001:db8:0::1 is NOT acceptable 2001:db8::1 is CORRECT
Notes:
Applying section 4.2.1
--VERIFIER NOTES--
--- ek@ ---
Section 2.2 is, as part of Section 2, listing "Examples of flexibility". There is nothing prescriptive in any of these sections and, as noted, section 4.2.* is where the recommendations are made.
