Early Review of draft-ietf-ippm-qoo-04
review-ietf-ippm-qoo-04-perfmetrdir-early-aitken-2025-11-29-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ippm-qoo
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Early Review
Team Performance Metrics Directorate (perfmetrdir)
Deadline 2025-12-05
Requested 2025-11-12
Requested by Mohamed Boucadair
Authors Bjørn Ivar Teigen , Magnus Olden , Ike Kunze
I-D last updated 2026-03-08 (Latest revision 2026-02-19)
Completed reviews Perfmetrdir Early review of -04 by Paul Aitken (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Joerg Ott
Genart IETF Last Call review of -06 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Mališa Vučinić (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -06 by Martin Thomson (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -07 by Will (Shucheng) LIU
Comments 
Can you please schedule a perfdir review of this spec? Thank you.

This work was presented at the IETF 124 host speakers session: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idxwZVhpWVA. I encourage to watch.
Assignment Reviewer Paul Aitken
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-ippm-qoo by Performance Metrics Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pm-dir/d9nUVhx6y1UcYgwMVr0OzbZJAp0
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 07)
Result Has nits
Completed 2025-11-29
review-ietf-ippm-qoo-04-perfmetrdir-early-aitken-2025-11-29-00
I reviewed draft-ietf-ippm-qoo-04 for PMdir.

Overall I found it well written and clear. There were some editorial nits which
I've posted separately.

One issue is that the document did not specify how performance requirements and
metadata can be specified and shared in a standard and interoperable way. Med's
AD review indicates that these considerations should be clearly marked as out
of scope.